I have serious concerns about the Frankston Council ceding its powers to the state government, which can create the impression that our
local leaders have limited choices. While the FMAC seems to benefit large developers and big-property owners, it often overlooks the rights
of the surrounding neighborhoods and the council itself. The state government’s planning regulations are insufficient, allowing these
developments to operate with little oversight. This situation raises worries about the rights of residents in high-rise towers, who may find
themselves dependent on body corporate structures that are poorly regulated in Australia. Moreover, these buildings could face significant
structural issues, especially given our country's track record with construction. This could lead to uninsurability for many owners,
exposing them to financial and safety risks. I believe we should focus on creating more green spaces within the city, and reevaluating our
approach to retail and construction. As more business shifts online, it’s essential to refurbish and insulate existing buildings,
incorporating passive solar design to reduce energy consumption. Dark towers are not appropriate for this. We also need to foster a stable
and supportive environment for young and old people, with affordable rental options and secure housing. This will encourage entrepreneurship
and manufacturing, making it less risky for new businesses. Lastly, enhancing education in technical, scientific, and diverse vocational
fields (rural and urban) is crucial. Frankston has great potential in low-impact natural tourism, leveraging our beautiful countryside and
coastline to promote wildlife observation and conservation. Unfortunately, the current focus on constant expansion is undermining these
opportunities.